Ad imageAd image

Real Madrid President Explodes With New Claims Against Barcelona And La Liga Referees

8 Min Read

Real Madrid President Explodes With New Claims Against Barcelona and La Liga Referees

Real Madrid president Florentino Perez has launched a strong and direct attack on Barcelona, La Liga and the level of refereeing in Spain. Speaking at the Assembly of Representative Members, he repeated his concerns about refereeing standards and brought up past controversies involving his club’s biggest rival.

Perez focused on the Negreira case, the performance of Spanish referees and La Liga’s attempt to move Barcelona’s match against Villarreal to Miami. His comments have created major discussion across Spanish football because they touch on sensitive issues that have already caused tension in the league.

Perez Calls Spanish Refereeing “Unacceptable”

Florentino Perez did not hold back when discussing refereeing in Spain. He said the level of Spanish refereeing is “unacceptable” and openly criticised the fact that none of the 35 Spanish on-field referees were selected by FIFA.

He described the situation as a disgrace. In his words, “The level of Spanish refereeing is also unacceptable. It’s a disgrace that FIFA didn’t select a single one of the 35 Spanish on-field referees.” His comments highlight his belief that refereeing in Spain has fallen behind global standards.

Perez’s frustration reflects growing pressure on referees in La Liga and the demand for greater transparency and improvement in match officiating.

Perez Brings Up the Negreira Case Again

A major part of his speech focused on the Negreira case. Perez repeated the point that he finds it unacceptable that Barcelona paid the vice-president of the referees association for many years.

He said, “And of course, it’s also unacceptable that Barcelona, for whatever reason, paid the vice-president of the referees’ association more than 8 million euros for at least 17 years. He held important positions, and this period coincides, coincidentally, with Barcelona’s best results in our country.”

Perez did not change his stance on the matter and used the assembly to remind the members of Real Madrid about the seriousness of the case. His comments show that the issue continues to play an important role in the rivalry between Real Madrid and Barcelona.

Anger Over La Liga’s Miami Match Attempt

Perez also criticised La Liga’s attempt to move Barcelona’s match against Villarreal to Miami. He explained that he finds the idea unacceptable and questioned the motives behind it.

He said, “It’s not normal that the president of La Liga wants to impose a match on us in Miami, something that even Barça’s captain, Frank de Jong, doesn’t think is normal.”

Perez also argued that it was wrong for La Liga to support Barcelona and Villarreal with extra financial incentives for playing in Miami. He said, “And it’s also not normal that La Liga supports two teams, Barcelona and Villarreal, receiving extra financial incentives for playing in Miami.”

He then compared the situation to the NFL’s previous match in Miami. He explained that the NFL match was legal and supported by everyone, while the attempted La Liga match lacked full support and did not follow the same rules.

Perez stated, “The NFL game was legal and in accordance with the competition rules, and it also had the full support of everyone. It’s not the same; it didn’t even have UEFA’s backing. It’s nothing more than a failed gamble.”

What Perez’s Comments Mean for Real Madrid and La Liga

Perez’s comments show clear disagreement with the direction La Liga is taking. His speech suggests that he believes many decisions made by the league are unfair or not in the best interest of Real Madrid.

He has raised three main concerns:

  1. The standard of refereeing in Spain
  2. The long-term payments received by a former refereeing official connected to Barcelona
  3. The attempt to move a league match to the United States

These issues show a wide gap between Real Madrid and La Liga’s leadership. They also highlight how deep the rivalry with Barcelona remains, especially when referencing the Negreira case.

These comments could influence how fans, clubs and the league itself discuss reform, fairness and consistency in Spanish football.

Impact on the Rivalry Between Real Madrid and Barcelona

This speech adds more fire to the already intense rivalry. By referring directly to the Negreira case and claiming it coincided with Barcelona’s most successful period, Perez has made a strong statement.

His repeated criticism shows that Real Madrid sees the issue as part of a larger problem in Spanish football. Barcelona have maintained their own defence regarding the payments, but Perez’s comments will keep the controversy alive.

The rivalry is not only about results on the pitch. It also includes political, financial and institutional battles, and Perez’s speech shows how these tensions continue to shape Spanish football.

What Comes Next

Perez’s comments could push La Liga to respond or clarify its position, especially concerning refereeing and the Miami match idea. The league may also face pressure to improve transparency, communicate decisions more clearly and handle disputes more openly.

For Real Madrid, Perez’s speech strengthens the club’s stance. The president has made it clear that he expects higher standards in the league and that he will challenge any decision he finds unfair.

The next steps from La Liga, Barcelona or any football authority will be closely watched. The statements made at the assembly will continue to influence discussions and shape the direction of Spanish football.

FAQs

Q1. Who made these statements?

A. Real Madrid president Florentino Perez made all the statements in the article.

Q2. What did he say about referees?

A. He said the level of Spanish refereeing is unacceptable and called it a disgrace that FIFA did not select any Spanish on-field referees.

Q3. What did he say about Barcelona?

A. He criticised Barcelona for paying the vice-president of the referees association more than 8 million euros for at least 17 years.

Q4. Why did he mention Miami?

A. He said it was not normal for La Liga to try to impose a match in Miami and criticised the idea of giving extra financial incentives to the clubs involved.

Q5. What did he say about the NFL match comparison?

A. He said the NFL match was legal, followed the rules and had full support, while the La Liga idea was a failed gamble without complete approval.

Also Read- What Has Gone Wrong With Arne Slot’s Liverpool?